科研帝上线啦!115万本专业的英文电子书全部免费下载!

科研帝

 找回密码
 立即注册

手机号码,快捷登录

金币不够用?来这充值VIP学者,无限量下载
查看: 179|回复: 3

Thinking and Deciding-[4]-[2007]-[pdf]-[Jonathan Baron]

[复制链接]
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2018-10-7 11:51
  • 签到天数: 68 天

    [LV.6]常住居民II

    22

    主题

    113

    帖子

    227

    积分

    管理员

    Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

    金币
    1623
    关注领域
    物理学
    QQ
    发表于 2017-11-5 10:00:16 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
    提示:本书回复后可见下载链接(点击链接后等待30秒内会自动启动下载),普通用户回复扣5金币,VIP用户免费下载。还不是VIP?点击这里加入VIP→


    免费下载30页预览文件

    书籍信息:
    标题: Thinking and Deciding
    语言: English
    格式: pdf
    大小: 2.4M
    页数: 600
    年份: 2007
    作者: Jonathan Baron
    版次: 4
    出版社: Cambridge University Press

    简介

    This is the fourth edition of Jonathan Baron's very popular textbook on decision-making and thinking. The text is inspired by, and develops carefully and in an entertaining manner, the basic theories and experimental results of Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky, George Loewenstein, Paul Slovic, and others in the "heuristics and biases" tradition. This school of thought is only 35 years old, but it has radically transformed our knowledge of human decision-making. The material is inherently engaging, and students love to study it. This is an excellent book, and fully covers the subject material, except for graduate students who plan to work in this area, who should read the primary material on which this book is based. It is also great for self-study by the curious lay reader.

    Let me say at the outset that the negative reviews of this book are totally unwarranted. One is just the ranting of a persons who cannot give reasons, but only throw out unsupported, idiosyncratic, judgments. Another is by a reader with an ax to grind concerning philosophical issues in probability theory that are completely tangential to the purposes of this book I think these commentators would do well to withdraw their useless and diverting comments.

    Baron is a talented experimenter in his own right, although in the book he limits his material almost exclusively to the works of the Old Masters, Kahneman et al. His own contribution is on an interpretive level. First, his basic model of human behavior is what he calls the "search-inference" model, which turns out to be the economist's "rational actor" model, in which decision-makers have preferences ("goals" in the search-inference terminology), beliefs, and constraints, and act to maximize utility (goal-attainment) subject ot constraints. Baron defines "rational thinking" as "whatever kind of thinking best helps people achieve their goals." (p. 61) This, of course, is precisely the definition of rationality in the rational actor tradition in decision-theory. Of course, "preferences" are more specific than "goals," and it is not clear to me whether "rational" in Baron's sense includes achieving goals that are welfare-reducing (e.g., substance abuse), whereas in the rational actor tradition, rationality has to do with the attainment of goals with no evaluation of the relationship between goals and personal welfare.

    Baron introduces two normative notions which instructors will find useful. The first is the idea of "actively open-minded thinking," and the second is "multi-attribute utility theory." Together, they urge that decision-maker cast a wide net in evaluating alternatives before honing in on a particular choice. The examples illustrating the value of this approach are illuminating and helpful.

    This book does not make clear that there has been a second wave of behavioral experiments, starting in the mid-1980's that focus less on isolated decisions, and more on decisions in a setting of strategic interaction, using game theory as a tool of experimental design. This new body of theory and evidence deals with fairness and justice, altruism, cooperation, insider-outsider interactions, and related themes, in a manner barely intimated in this book. The chapters on altruism, fairness, and moral reasoning, are at least fifteen years out of date, and should not be used in a classroom today. There is, of course, plenty of material in the book without using these chapters, for a whole course on decision-making and thinking, but for strategic interaction, cooperation, and conflict, a completely different set of readings are required---and perhaps a completely new course devoted exclusively to this material.

    A major focus of this book is on biases in decision-making---human errors that are not simply random, but rather are consistently biased in a particular direction. For instance, in the Draw A Man diagnostic, clinicians systematically interpret big eyes on a patient's drawing as indicative of paranoia, despite the fact that no such statistical relationship has ever been found. Moreover, untrained students also make the same mistake, indicating that this judgment is a systematic error committed by many people. The tragedy is that the clinicians do not abandon their biases when faced with objective data.

    While systematic bias is a very important phenomenon, Baron does not claim that the rational actor models used by economists, in which biases do not exist, are contradicted by the experimental evidence---a criticism that the heuristic and bias researchers are usually fond of leveling against economic theory. Rather, he says that effective decision-making is the rule, especially when the parameters of the decision problem are clear, and that we should approach the biases that arise in complex decision contexts as challenges that we can overcome if we have the proper decision-making protocols.

    Why do economists ignore biases in decision making, while psychologists take them so seriously? The answer is that economists only care about individual decision-making because they need a model of individual behavior that they can aggregate to model the macro-economy. Moreover, they consider their most fruitful professional interventions not in helping people make better decisions,  but rather in advising governments and firms how to manipulate such macroeconomic variables as tax, profit margins, and interest rates. Psychologists, by contrast, consider the individual, not society, as the focus of their ministrations. Hence they tend to ignore the enormous success of the rational actor paradigm in modeling social behavior, and rather focus on areas of vulnerability in individual decision-making, where professional interventions on the level of the individual can improve decision-making accuracy.

    电子书下载地址回复可见:
    游客,如果您要查看本帖隐藏内容请回复

    每天进步一点点
    回复

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2019-12-8 11:21
  • 签到天数: 5 天

    [LV.2]偶尔看看I

    0

    主题

    38

    帖子

    38

    积分

    VIP学者

    Rank: 5Rank: 5

    金币
    99908
    发表于 2020-2-12 12:51:15 | 显示全部楼层
    Thank you~
    回复

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2018-12-28 09:46
  • 签到天数: 3 天

    [LV.2]偶尔看看I

    0

    主题

    763

    帖子

    763

    积分

    VIP学者

    Rank: 5Rank: 5

    金币
    6438
    发表于 2020-2-24 10:04:06 | 显示全部楼层
    fdvsfrgsefgrsedf
    回复

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2019-1-2 20:59
  • 签到天数: 20 天

    [LV.4]偶尔看看III

    0

    主题

    3281

    帖子

    3281

    积分

    VIP学者

    Rank: 5Rank: 5

    金币
    96710
    发表于 2020-3-24 16:25:43 | 显示全部楼层
    Thinking and Deciding
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    本版积分规则

    关闭

    站长推荐上一条 /1 下一条

    QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|科研帝   

    GMT+8, 2020-4-8 03:08 , Processed in 0.065288 second(s), 28 queries .

    Powered by Discuz! X3.4

    © 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表